An Argument Against Abortion Essay -- Pro Life Pro-life essays researc

Abortion in America is a controversial extend in which both sides have valid arguments at face value. The pro-choice side has many arguments to support it belief in keeping spontaneous abortion legal. Many of these be faulty, and argue points irrelevant to the issue as I result attempt to illustrate, thereby eliminating the main pro-choice arguments.The pro- support positioning has somewhat different ideas. The most popular of these is The unborn entity is fully mankind from the moment of conception. Abortion results in the intentional death of the unborn entity. Therefore, abortion can be defined the intentional killing of a man being. This killing is in most cases unjustified, since the unborn merciful being being being has a full right to life. If, however, there is a high probability that a womans pregnancy will result in her death ( much(prenominal) as tubal pregnancy, for example), hence abortion is justified. For it is a greater good that one human should live (t he mother) rather than two die (the mother and her youngster). Or, in much(prenominal) cases the intent is non to kill the unborn but to save the life of the mother. With the exception of such cases, abortion is an act in which an innocent human being is intentionally killed therefore, abortion should be made illegal, as are all other such acts of killing.One argument made by people in prefer of abortion is an appeal to leniency. When one fallaciously argues by appealing to pity, one is arguing that certain actions should be permitted or tolerated come in of pity for those performing them when in fact the basis for showing them pity is non a legitimate basis for the action. For example, a woman who argues that she should not receive a parking ticket because her child was crying and she took her child to a candy store to cheer her up is appealing to pity. The future(a) abortion rights arguments are examples.Anyone who goes to pro-choice demonstrations in the United States wil l perceive on pro-choice buttons a drawing of a coat hanger. This is the sign of the pro-choice movement representing the many women who were harmed or killed because they either performed illegal abortions on themselves (i.e., the surgery was performed with a coat hanger) or went to physicians. That means, if abortion is made illegal, then women will once again be h... ...asy economic access to such professionals.In the abortion debate the marvel of whether abortion entails the death of a being who is fully human mustiness be answered before the question of fairness is even asked. That means, since equal opportunity to eliminate an innocent human being is rarely a moral good, the question of whether it is fair that moneyed people will have access to abortion if it becomes illegal must be answered after the question of whether abortion in fact is not the killing of an innocent human life is answered. This is like saying the benefits of the sloshed are virtues simply because t he poor are denied them. Sounds like bs to me.Although the abortion argument will probably go on forever, eliminating faulty arguments will help people r distributively a reasonable decision on the issue. When the pro-choice side argues such points as the ones above, it tricks many people by playing on such things as peoples sympathy and compassion wrongly. If each side was represented fairly, it is likely people would become in favor of a ban on abortion when facts are the issue alternatively of a false play to peoples emotion.