Inside Gates versus Out of Gates :: science

Inside Gates versus Out of GatesTurkey as an leash World Society extracts rapid urbanization process without industrialization which causes approximately problems in housing situation. In postwar period USA gave martial aid to Turkey, in order to provide to Europe agricultural needs, so on that point appears jobless villagers and sh atomic number 18croppers because of changes in agricultural sector in scathe of providing surplus by tractors namely by less human repulse. So migration to big cities was emerged which is the reason for dumpy settlements existence. On the other hand globalization plays a grapheme in suburban development which is the upper-class rafts choice for leaving heterogeneous environment in metropolis centers that causes to emerge new suburban homogeneous settlements as gated communities.Firstly, formation of squatter settlements implies temporariness and the term gecekondu refer arming in one night. People build their gecekondus with having rising expec tations for their future because they dont have pessimistic feelings although they see in slums in the lack of even electricity. Gecekondu people are negatively labeled (stigmatized) as peasants in the city, uneducated, uncivilized, uncultured, backwards. They are also called as varo, which is a sign of subordination and exclusion of these kinds of people. (Kiziltan, 2004) They survive in urban life by the help of democratic parties because they have high select potential, which is populism as a political aspect, and also they provide cheap labor as their reciprocal ohm survival factor in economic dimension. Gecekondu pardon/pardoning become potential as gecekondu people play a role in production-having cheap labor potential and also in pulmonary tuberculosis by buying products which urban people use, in order to show that they can adapt to the urban life. According to Mass Society Theory, when individuals just connect to society they become members of social movements and mobi lize against system. Besides this theory, second generation migrants are relatively deprived and fail to adapt in urban life so they display radical politic actions, feat to challenge status quo, mobilize against advantaged groups. At the beginning squatters have only use cling to but after this value begin to twisting into exchange value, so gecekondu people start to be stigmatized as unmerited rich, the villagers want to migrate to city to benefit from this exchanged value and other urban life social institutions(health services, educationetc) so there exits social mobility towards cities. Also, there is another factor which causes social mobility in squatters squatters are heterogeneous environments which consist of people from different geographical background, so it is possible to expect high social mobility in these settlements.