'Conceptualizing Addiction Paper Essay\r'

'The memorial of dependance goes back centuries, and unfortunately, in that respect is still a long way to go for people to sympathize the effectuate of chemical substances do more injure than good. The difference between drug use and shout relies heavily on a some em carcass’s dependence on the substance. The line between the differences is a good deal in truth fine. Depending on other factors involved, such as morals, values, environment, and hereditary predisposition, the line result most app bent be crossed without regard to the consequences until discourse and rec everywherey are the only options left. This is strive compares two speculative explanations for addiction, including a psychological possible action, and a biological theory. In addition, the writer will describe the viewpoints of each copy, and how their persuasiveness in addiction prevention and intervention.\r\nThe mental soulfulnessate\r\nThe psychological model includes cognitive behav ioral theories, psychodynamic theories, and the tuition theory. Cognitive-behavioral theories associate a soul’s need for taking drugs with their need for variety (McNeece & DiNitto, 2012). mess often look for fulfillment and pleasure as they carry out their day-to-day responsibilities, thus conclusion chemical substances a way to escape veracity or a reward. Psychodynamic theories suggest more colonial explanations are the reason behind drug addiction. childhood experiences and structure within the family determine a person’s ability to cope soci every last(predicate)y and emotionally. Thus, the person uses drugs to for remove about the pain or supply a false sense of security.\r\nFinally, the reading theory of addiction implies that people learn over epoch and exposure to drugs that anxiety, tension, and stress all decrease with use, seemly a reinforcer for the user (McNeece & DiNitto, 2012). individually of theories exempt addiction in terms of a malfunctioning apprehension process or learning process that fundament be reversed. For less complete(a) cases of addiction, this type of give-and-take is effective. However, usually, a multi-treatment approach is necessary. psychological models focus on the emotion and the sagacity, while biological models, as discussed next, find that addictive behaviors depend on the structure and chemistry in the body’s genetic makeup.\r\nThe Biological Model\r\nâ€Å"The statistical associations between genetic factors and alcohol aversion are very strong” (McNeece & DiNitto, 2012). However, at that place is still oftentimes debate over the validity of genetics as a definite cause for addiction. Perhaps, the reason for this is because the enactment of children of alcoholics that go on to be come down alcoholics is still small. Additionally, genetic predisposition can non exempt the number of cases of alcoholics that did non come from alcoholic parents or families . In fact, addiction can be so prominent, that it remains even after the drug use has ended (McNeece & DiNitto, 2012). thitherfore, the biological theory should not be ruled as it is based on what takes place in the body. There is no other theory that can explain how a person could still take a leak addiction symptoms when the substance is absent from their system. Predisposition implies that thither is a mutation or malfunction in the body that appears to cause a craving or cogency to becoming addicted to a substance.\r\nComparing Psychological and Biological Models\r\nBoth of the psychological and biological models explain addiction. In addition, both models take a holistic approach in their arguments. They simply emphasize a certain portion of the body and based their studies near that. Interestingly, the theories related to the psychological model are all insightful to how humans think and interact, however, they do not explain well the interactions that take place at on ce a substance takes over quite the likes of the biological model. Finally, the main shortcoming of the psychological model of addiction is the treatment approaches, which attempt to retrain a person’s thinking. Since biologists have proved there are specific genetic components of addiction that are naturally either present or absent, create a mutation, a simple change of judgement will not be enough to bring back addiction in most cases.\r\nTreatment for dependence Prevention and Intervention\r\nOut of the two models, the biological model has impressive supporting evidence regarding treatment for addiction. Perhaps, this is because of the perspective of how addiction affects people. It is easier to find a rootage to a problem that is explained with support, rather than common thought patterns shared between people. Addiction may have specific characteristics that users share, but ultimately, it will affect everyone otherwise and many factors will be involved. Problems a ssociated with drug abuse affect areas such as the digestive, cardiovascular, and reproductive systems, which is some other advantage of biological treatment. Biologists study these systems and there functions and how addiction affects them. Thus, allowing them to incorporate treatment techniques that specialize in minimizing the effects of addiction while restoring the body’s systems. The duration, extent, and resiliency of the person still plays a vital social occasion in the recovery and treatment process.\r\nConclusion\r\nThe bill of addiction continues to stir controversy as to how it starts, who it affects, and why. fleck many choose to use chemical substances to get variety out of life, there are several(prenominal) that become addicted who cannot even give an resolution as to why they continue to use. This is a business firm of chemical dependency and typically means that the body and mind have now been altered in such a way that there will be adverse effects i f and when a person chooses to stop using. Often, the decision to stop using is not voluntary. For many, there is not a realization that there is even a problem. There are secure as many models that explain addiction as there are reasons that people become addicted.\r\nThis essay explored the psychological and biological models of addiction. The psychological model deals with the mind and emotions, suggesting that people learn and adapt to certain behaviors over time. The biological model explains addiction as existence present in all of us anterior to being born, depending on the genetic predisposition and mutations. Arguably, no theory is better than another at explaining addiction. However, there is substantial evidence that supports the biological model and its treatment when dealing with people with addictions.\r\nReference\r\nMcNeece, C.A., & DiNitto, D.M. (2012). chemic Dependency: A systems approach (4th ed.). Upper excite River, NJ: Pearson.\r\n'