Do our emotions lead us to understand reality or create it?

Do our emotions overhaul us in understanding tender race or do they lead us to hold it? IB TOK 2nd Draft 09-09-09 Block 7 Ms. Sangeeta Kala thither is an intent truth out there, but we view it finished the glasses of our beliefs, attitudes, and values (Myers, Online). Reality can be define in several different ways and Lagemaat divides reality in triplet different parts: common-sense naive realness, scientific naturalism and phenomenalism. Common-sense realism dictates that the way we perceive the world mirrors the way the world is (87) human beings phenomenalism states that to be is to be perceived (100) and that all knowledge is erect on past experience. The conflict between the two is that common-sense realism takes reality to be objective while phenomenalism describes reality as a subjective experience. If we take common-sense realism to be true, and so reality is just understood by us and on the other hand, phenomenalism is a subjective reality and thus, it is created based on our past experiences. However, is there any common-sense realism that is created by us? For example, if we see a chair, we understand that it is an object that is existent and its main(prenominal) purpose is to be sat on but if we use up the akin chair to hit someone, have we created a impudently reality? Emotions are tools that contribute and help us to sometimes understand reality while create reality on other occasions. Does this mean that emotions can not help us to create as well as understand reality at the same time? It is feasible to create as well as understand reality at the same time. For example, Newtons second law of motion is the groundwork of a refreshing reality as it was unknown in front; as yet Newton had to ardently understand Aristotles ideas and laws of... If you want to direct a full essay, order it on our website : Ord! erCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper